Sunday, November 3, 2013, certainly did not disappoint at
the AAMC 2013 meeting in Philadelphia. I
had the opportunity to attend many great sessions. This blog will touch on two of them.
Digital Literacy
The session on digital literacy was as engaging as any I’ve
ever attended. The speakers brought
cases from real life to discuss with the participants. Table exercises provided the substrate for
meaningful interaction among people who literally met two minutes ago. There were some quotes that hit home for the
audience. All come from the speakers, Bryan
Vartabedian, Neil Mehta, Warren Wiechmann, and Jennifer Salopek.
“Every provider should
be prepared to deal with unsolicited requests via digital media.”
“On public platforms,
physicians are under no obligation to respond to solicitations from prospective
patients.”
“Patients put their
trust in us, and it is our obligation to educate them in real and digital environments.”
“We are in the age of
the public physician. We need to
function in this new environment.”
This session really hit home for me, as I realized that
there are great folks studying this new field, which itself is moving as fast as a teenager’s thumbs on a smartphone texting a friend!
The group launched an extremely helpful resource toolkit for
digital literacy, found here. This toolkit is a work in progress, but marks an important step for those
educators who need help in teaching the future generation.
How Doctors, Nurses and Consumers Can Make One Another
Better
This session was a real treat, as the speaker was Anna Quindlen,
the Pulitzer Prize-winning author. She spoke with no slides whatsoever (what a concept at a medical conference!). However, one could hear a pin drop in the
room (which required an overflow room to accommodate all those who wanted to
hear her speak). Anna spoke from the
heart about real-life interactions with the medical profession, some of which
shed a light on the humanism that still exists in medicine, and others which
provided, well, simply put, an “opportunity for improvement” regarding
communication interactions with patients and families. Given my interest in using emerging
technology in medicine and medical education, I really loved these comments
(paraphrased here):
“There is no technology that can take the
place of humanism; despite technological advances, human touch is more necessary
than ever before.”
And this one, reflecting on her own work as a writer, was
truly profound:
“In the drama of my
own body, I have become both the story and the reporter.”
I think the session can best be summed up from this
statement by the moderator, Richard Levin:
“We must keep the ‘care’ in
healthcare.”
Yes, we must! Anna, thank you for sharing your stories with
me and so many others.
I think these two sessions provided a perfect intersection
between the need to “push technology” while still “going back to the basics” of
humanism in medicine. Lest those who
feel technology is obliterating the human connection, I would tend to disagree:
the lunchtime discussion with the digital literacy speakers demonstrated to me
that we can have both humanism AND technology together.
Yes, we can have our cake AND eat it too!
Thanks for the great post! Phil
ReplyDeleteMorning Alex
ReplyDeleteI put this blog on the front page of http://www.InternetMedicine.com, because it carries an important message.
thanks, and enjoy the Philly cheesesteaks. I went to Med School in Philly.
John Bennett MD
Miami